HairFacts | Hair Removal Information

Alexandrite laser medical data


Alexandrite laser medical data

Alexandrite lasers for hair removal were cleared by FDA to market in the U.S. in 1997. Despite its current popularity, there’s not a lot of data on alexandrites for hair removal. [1] Arguably the best overview is Ash. [2]

A short-term study of 130 female subjects had an average of 8 facial treatments over 18 months. Researchers observed an average 75% reduction for dark hair at 3 months and 10% for light hair. [3]A similar study noted 81% to 95% reduction at 3 months after 3 to 5 treatments, [4] as did a smaller study which observed 86% reduction at 3 months after a single treatment. [5] One comparative study observed 74% reduction at 3 months after 4 treatments, which was about twice the clearance they observed with electrolysis. [6] Another with short term follow-up observed 19% reduction at 3 months, which compared favorably to Nd:YAG. [7]

A mid-range study observed 25-47% reduction at 4 to 6 months after 1 or 2 treatments in various areas. [8] A similar study found 66% reduction at 1 month, 27% reduction at 3 months, and 4% reduction at 6 months. [9]

One study of treatment at the bikini found an average of 43% reduction at 6 months plus “one growth cycle” after a single treatment, with 60% of sites having greater than 30%. [10] Another study with five bikini treatments observed 78% reduction at 12 months after final treatment. [11] One study comparing long and short pulsewidths observed about 33% reduction at 6 months for both pulsewidths. [12] This was also observed in a study observing 60% to 80% reduction at 6 months after 3 treatments. [13] Damage to follicles was confirmed in one thorough histological analysis. [14]

In 150 dark-skinned patients (skin type IV-VI) treated with alexandrite side effects occurred in about 2% of cases. [15] This matches results in a large-scale study of lighter skin types. [16] Preheating or precooling the skin before treatment may help reduce side effects. [17, 18] Lower fluences have been observed to cause higher rates of double hairs as regrowth. [19]

References

  1. Please see summary below.
  2. Ash K, Lord J, Newman J, McDaniel DH. Hair removal using a long-pulsed alexandrite laser. Dermatologic Clinics. 1999 Apr;17(2):387-99, ix.
  3. Raulin C, Greve B. Temporary hair loss using the long-pulsed alexandrite laser at 20 milliseconds. European Journal of Dermatology. 2000 Mar;10(2):103-6.
  4. Finkel B, Eliezri YD, Waldman A, Slatkine M. Pulsed alexandrite laser technology for noninvasive hair removal. Journal of Clinical Laser Medicine and Surgery. 1997;15(5):225-9.
  5. Connolly CS, Paolini L. Study reveals successful removal of unwanted hair with LPIR laser. Cosmetic Dermatology 1997;10:38-40.
  6. Gorgu M, Aslan G, Akoz T, Erdogan B. Comparison of alexandrite laser and electrolysis for hair removal. Dermatologic Surgery. 2000 Jan;26(1):37-41.
  7. Rogers CJ, Glaser DA, Siegfried EC, Walsh PM. Hair removal using topical suspension-assisted Q-switched Nd:YAG and long-pulsed alexandrite lasers: A comparative study. Dermatologic Surgery. 1999 Nov;25(11):844-4; discussion 848-50.
  8. McDaniel DH, Lord J, Ash K, Newman J, Zukowski M. Laser hair removal: a review and report on the use of the long-pulsed alexandrite laser for hair reduction of the upper lip, leg, back, and bikini region. Dermatologic Surgery. 1999 Jun;25(6):425-30.
  9. Nanni CA, Alster TS. Long-pulsed alexandrite laser-assisted hair removal at 5, 10, and 20 millisecond pulse durations. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 1999;24(5):332-7.
  10. Laughlin SA, Dudley DK. Long-term Hair removal using a 3-millesecond alexandrite laser. Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery. 2000 Apr;4(2):83-88.
  11. Lloyd JR, Mirkov M. Long-term evaluation of the long-pulsed alexandrite laser for the removal of bikini hair at shortened treatment intervals. Dermatologic Surgery. 2000 Jul;26(7):633-7.
  12. Goldberg DJ, Ahkami R. Evaluation comparing multiple treatments with a 2-msec and 10-msec alexandrite laser for hair removal. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 1999;25(3):223-8.
  13. Boss WK Jr, Usal H, Thompson RC, Fiorillo MA. A comparison of the long-pulse and short-pulse Alexandrite laser hair removal systems. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 1999 Apr;42(4):381-4.
  14. Ono I, Tateshita T. Histopathological changes in the hair follicle after irradiation of long-pulse alexandrite laser equipped with a cooling device. European Journal of Dermatology. 2000 Jul-Aug;10(5):373-8.
  15. Garcia C, Alamoudi H, Nakib M, Zimmo S. Alexandrite laser hair removal is safe for Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI. Dermatologic Surgery. 2000 Feb;26(2):130-4.
  16. Nanni CA, Alster TS. Laser-assisted hair removal: side effects of Q-switched Nd:YAG, long-pulsed ruby, and alexandrite lasers. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1999 Aug;41(2 Pt 1):165-71.
  17. Topping A, Gault D, Grobbelaar A, Green C, Sanders R, Sibbons P, Linge C. Successful reduction in skin damage resulting from exposure to the normal-mode ruby laser in an animal model. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 2001 Mar;54(2):144-150.
  18. Raulin C, Greve B, Hammes S. Cold air in laser therapy: first experiences with a new cooling system. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 2000;27(5):404-10.
  19. Ye JN, Prasad A, Trivedi P, Knapp DP, Chu P, Edelstein LM. Pili bigeminy induced by low fluence therapy with hair removal alexandrite and ruby lasers. Dermatologic Surgery 1999 Dec;25(12):969.
Summary of data with links to abstracts

= recommended only for in-depth researchers
= may be worth ordering
= strongly recommended

Human clinical studies

Connolly (1997): An early article showing 20 subjects had 86% reduction three months after a single treatment.

Finkel (1997): Finkel took before and after photographs of 126 fair- to dark-haired subjects who had 3 to 5 treatments on various areas. Observers of the photos noted 81% to 95% reduction 3 months after last treatment.

Fuchs (1997): an clinical early report of success.

Boss (1999): 18 subjects in full skin type range had treatment in various areas to compare long pulse and short pulse. Six months after 3 treatments, they report 60% to 80% reduction.

McDaniel (1999): 22 ideal subjects (light skin, dark hair) had 25-47% reduction at 4 to 6 months after 1 or 2 treatments in various areas.

Nanni (1999): 36 subjects had one treatment. Hair counts were reduced by 66% at 1 month, 27% at 3 months, and 4% at 6 months.

Goldberg (1999): 14 subjects had 3 treatments on paired sites. 6 months after treatment average reduction was about 34%.

Rogers (1999): 15 subjects had 1 alexandrite treatment on one armpit. 3 months after treatment average reduction was 19%.

Gorgu (2000): 12 subjects had one armpit treated with electrolysis and the other with alexandrite laser. 14 weeks after final treatment, they reported electrolysis had 35% clearance and laser had 74% clearance.

Raulin (2000): 130 female subjects had an average of 8 facial treatments over 18 months. 13 weeks after final treatment, average clearance was 75% for dark hair and 10% for light hair.

Ono (2000): A histopathological study comparing hairs before and after treatment.

Lloyd (2000): 11 subjects had 5 bikini treatments over 15 weeks. 1 year after final treatment, average clearance was 78%

Laughlin (2000): Photos of 25 various body sites getting one treatment were observed to have an average 43% reduction in terminal hairs after "one growth cycle." Counts remained stable 6 months after the growth cycle.

Side effects

Ye (1999): Reports that low-fluence alexandrite treatment can cause more than one hair to grow from the same follicle (pili bigemini).

Garcia (2000): In 150 dark-skinned patients (skin type IV-VI) treated with alexandrite, about 2% had side effects.

Reviews/overviews

Narukar (1998): Compares long-pulse on various skin types (no abstract).

Ash (1999): A fairly good overview of available data at the time of writing.

Nanni (1998): A practical review of lasers widely available at the time (Nd:YAG, ruby, alexandrite).

Exit mobile version