hair removal
hair removal facts: click for consumer recommendations
  
  Home  Medical data  X-ray   
   
NAVIGATION




Hair Removal Home
Hair Removal Methods
Hair Removal Directory
Hair Removal Search

Hair Removal "Permanent" *
Hair Removal Electrolysis *
Hair Removal Home electro *
Hair Removal Laser *
Hair Removal Flashlamp/IPL *
Hair Removal Combinations *
space * seeHair Removal note

Hair Removal Hair inhibitors
Hair Removal Home laser
Hair Removal Rx oral meds
Hair Removal Vaniqa

Hair Removal Temporary
Hair Removal Shaving
Hair Removal Depilatories
Hair Removal Friction
Hair Removal Tweezing
Hair Removal Waxing
Hair Removal Sugaring
Hair Removal Threading
Hair Removal Rotary epilators

Hair Removal Doubtful
Hair Removal Electric tweezer
Hair Removal Transdermal
Hair Removal Transcutaneous
Hair Removal Photoepilators
Hair Removal Microwaves
Hair Removal Dietary products
Hair Removal Herbal inhibitors

Hair Removal Recommended
Hair Removal Epilators
Hair Removal Electric razors
Hair Removal Home electrolysis
Hair Removal Home laser/IPL
Hair Removal Hot wax kits
Hair Removal Tweezers
Hair Removal Aftercare
Hair Removal Books

Hair Removal Other topics
Hair Removal  How to choose
Hair Removal  Tips
Hair Removal  Clinical data
Hair Removal  Manufacturers
Hair Removal  Regulation
Hair Removal  Info sources
Hair Removal  Scams
Hair Removal  Ripped off?

Hair Removal  FAQ
Hair Removal  Glossary
Hair Removal  Site info
Hair Removal  Feedback

X-ray medical data

X-rays for hair removal are currently banned by FDA in the US. In the first half of the 20th century, X-rays were used around the country in salons for hair removal. The results, while sometimes permanent, caused cancer, disfigurement and death in clients. While they are sometimes used in extremely limited amounts for medical eyelash removal procedures, X-rays are no longer allowed for cosmetic hair removal.

See the historical articles at the bottom of this page for some sobering lessons on the dangers of allowing powerful medical devices to be used by unqualified personnel, and the echoes of quackery seen today in the electric tweezer promotional literature.

= recommended only for in-depth researchers
= may be worth ordering
= strongly recommended

Published medical data

Pusey (1900): An early medical article extolling the virtues of x-ray hair removal.

Cipollaro (1947): This is the first published paper warning against the use of X-rays for hair removal.

Cleveland (1948): This paper lists some of the serious medical side effects of hair removal by X-ray

Shanks (1967): Discusses the deadly results of 36 years of x-ray scalp epilation at a British hospital.

Lapidus (1976): Discusses detailed case histories of 5 women who had cancer on their faces following Tricho System treatment.

Harley (1976): Observes a linear dose-response correlation for glands of children irradiated with x-rays for scalp ringworm.

Berry (1976): Guinea pig irradiation results in permanent partial epilation at doses in excess of 1400 rad, and complete epilation at 1 year occurs in 50 per cent of irradiated fields at 1740 rad. Side effects ranged from redness to raised blistering.

Johannsen (1978): Of 8 sheep receiving full-body x-ray irradiation, 5 were dead within 4 weeks.

Omran (1978): Discusses rates of mental disorder following x-ray epilation in 109 subjects.

Hartzlar (1984): X-rays used to treat eye malignancies can cause permanent loss of eyelashes

Rosen (1989): 12 x-ray hair removal patients have cancer rates and other symptoms that are comparable to those in survivors of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima.

Huda (1994): Reports on temporary epilation on a patient's scalp after receiving 110 minutes of radiation during a medical procedure.

Kyoizumi (1998): Histological study of human hair grafted onto mice which was then irradiated with x-rays.

Historical articles

Bookchin (1962): An excellent analysis of the Tricho System, with implications for use of other radiation-emitting devices for hair removal, such as laser and microwave.

Caufield (1989): A good overview discussing the Tricho System and the lack of regulatory response, as well as the difficulty faced by activists raising safety concerns.

McCoy (2000): The Museum of Questionable Medical Devices has a disucssion of the Tricho System, with illustrations and excerpts from original promotional material.

 

Was this helpful?  Support this site!
Still have questions? Ask them at my free HairTell  hair removal forum!

   
         

 

© 1996-2009 Andrea James. All rights reserved.
 

Legal Info / Terms of Use Revised 30 December, 2001 .