Omicron class action excerpts, 1973 In 1973, PhotoEpilator manufacturer Omicron Systems was sued
in California Superior Court by ten dissatisfied owners. The case
was settled out of court by Omicron.
The ten owners purchased and used Omicron machines in 1971 and
1972, but quickly found the device did not perform as promised.
The plaintiffs in the suit state in court documents, "We
strongly feel that there is very little evidence that the photoepilator
has any potential of permanent hair removal." Based on their
use of the devices, they further state that "it does not
perform as represented and is not reasonably effective in the
permanent removal of hair."
The owners also describe the pain of the punching into a follicle
with the oversized fiberoptic probe and the tweezing effect from
poorly treated hairs. Finally, they claim it is "extremely
boring, tedious, dull and an exhausting technique" that took
up to 40 seconds per hair.
Upon settling the lawsuit, Omicron gave refunds after the plaintiffs
returned the devices. Unfortunately, the devices were then resold
to Carol Block, who continues to market photoepilators under the
D'Plume brand name to this day.
Sources: California Superior Court, San Mateo County, Docket
173345 (Bien et. al. v. Omicron)
|
hair removal
facts
for consumers
Home
