hair removal
hair removal facts: click for consumer recommendations
  
  Home  Medical data  Laser/Light  Photoepilator  Gior 1972 (unpublished)   
   
NAVIGATION




Hair Removal Home
Hair Removal Methods
Hair Removal Directory
Hair Removal Search

Hair Removal "Permanent" *
Hair Removal Electrolysis *
Hair Removal Home electro *
Hair Removal Laser *
Hair Removal Flashlamp/IPL *
Hair Removal Combinations *
space * seeHair Removal note

Hair Removal Hair inhibitors
Hair Removal Home laser
Hair Removal Rx oral meds
Hair Removal Vaniqa

Hair Removal Temporary
Hair Removal Shaving
Hair Removal Depilatories
Hair Removal Friction
Hair Removal Tweezing
Hair Removal Waxing
Hair Removal Sugaring
Hair Removal Threading
Hair Removal Rotary epilators

Hair Removal Doubtful
Hair Removal Electric tweezer
Hair Removal Transdermal
Hair Removal Transcutaneous
Hair Removal Photoepilators
Hair Removal Microwaves
Hair Removal Dietary products
Hair Removal Herbal inhibitors

Hair Removal Recommended
Hair Removal Epilators
Hair Removal Electric razors
Hair Removal Home electrolysis
Hair Removal Home laser/IPL
Hair Removal Hot wax kits
Hair Removal Tweezers
Hair Removal Aftercare
Hair Removal Books

Hair Removal Other topics
Hair Removal  How to choose
Hair Removal  Tips
Hair Removal  Clinical data
Hair Removal  Manufacturers
Hair Removal  Regulation
Hair Removal  Info sources
Hair Removal  Scams
Hair Removal  Ripped off?

Hair Removal  FAQ
Hair Removal  Glossary
Hair Removal  Site info
Hair Removal  Feedback

Gior, 1972

In 1971, Fino Gior, then president of the International Guild of Professional Electrologists, purchased an Omicron PhotoEpilator for evaluation.

Gior treated 49 areas in an uncontrolled study:

20 upper lips
15 chins
11 sets of eyebrows
3 male backs

All areas received three hours of treatment. After six months of observation, Gior concluded, "The results in all cases except the eyebrows was 100% regrowth. The eyebrows showed a very small improvement in 5 cases in which the women were over 50 years of age. I concluded this apparent permanent removal was simply due to mechanical tweezing, which at times can withdraw the dermal papillae."

"My conclusions were later confirmed by all electrologists using the apparatus in the state of California."

See California lawsuit excerpts

Source: IGPE report, August 6, 1982

 

Was this helpful?  Support this site!
Still have questions? Ask them at my free HairTell  hair removal forum!

   
         

 

© 1996-2009 Andrea James. All rights reserved.
 

Legal Info / Terms of Use Revised 30 December, 2001 .