hair removal
hair removal facts: click for consumer recommendations
  
  Home  Medical data  Laser/Light  Nd:YAG  Grossman 1995   
   
NAVIGATION




Hair Removal Home
Hair Removal Methods
Hair Removal Directory
Hair Removal Search

Hair Removal "Permanent" *
Hair Removal Electrolysis *
Hair Removal Home electro *
Hair Removal Laser *
Hair Removal Flashlamp/IPL *
Hair Removal Combinations *
space * seeHair Removal note

Hair Removal Hair inhibitors
Hair Removal Home laser
Hair Removal Rx oral meds
Hair Removal Vaniqa

Hair Removal Temporary
Hair Removal Shaving
Hair Removal Depilatories
Hair Removal Friction
Hair Removal Tweezing
Hair Removal Waxing
Hair Removal Sugaring
Hair Removal Threading
Hair Removal Rotary epilators

Hair Removal Doubtful
Hair Removal Electric tweezer
Hair Removal Transdermal
Hair Removal Transcutaneous
Hair Removal Photoepilators
Hair Removal Microwaves
Hair Removal Dietary products
Hair Removal Herbal inhibitors

Hair Removal Recommended
Hair Removal Epilators
Hair Removal Electric razors
Hair Removal Home electrolysis
Hair Removal Home laser/IPL
Hair Removal Hot wax kits
Hair Removal Tweezers
Hair Removal Aftercare
Hair Removal Books

Hair Removal Other topics
Hair Removal  How to choose
Hair Removal  Tips
Hair Removal  Clinical data
Hair Removal  Manufacturers
Hair Removal  Regulation
Hair Removal  Info sources
Hair Removal  Scams
Hair Removal  Ripped off?

Hair Removal  FAQ
Hair Removal  Glossary
Hair Removal  Site info
Hair Removal  Feedback

Grossman, 1995

Title: Treatment of cafe au lait macules with lasers. A clinicopathologic correlation.

Authors: Grossman MC, Anderson RR, Farinelli W, Flotte TJ, Grevelink JM

Journal: Arch Dermatol 1995 Dec;131(12):1416-20

PMID: 7492131, UI: 96094874

Affiliated institution: Dermatology Laser Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

Cited in: Solomon

BACKGROUND: Cafe au lait macules (CALMs) respond variably to treatment with different lasers. This study was done to determine whether the type of laser and the individual histologic features of the CALMs could predict clinical response to treatment. Nine CALMs were treated with both the frequency-doubled Q-switched neodymium: YAG laser (wavelength, 532 nm; beam diameter, 2.0 mm) and the Q-switched ruby laser (wavelength, 694 nm; beam diameter, 5.0 mm). Both lasers were used at a fluence of 6.0 J/cm2. Biopsy specimens of the CALMs were obtained before and after treatment. Clinical follow-up was done at 1-, 3-, and 6-month intervals.

OBSERVATIONS: Both lasers yielded variable responses to treatment. Two histologic subtypes of CALMs were identified, but these different subtypes did not predict clinical outcome after laser treatment.

CONCLUSIONS: Cafe au lait macules respond variably to treatment with both the Q-switched ruby laser and the frequency-doubled Q-switched neodymium:YAG laser. Further research might address the effect of using multiple treatments. In view of these results, clinicians using lasers to treat CALMs should inform their patients of the potential for recurrence or darkening of CALMs.

 

Was this helpful?  Support this site!
Still have questions? Ask them at my free HairTell  hair removal forum!

   
         

 

© 1996-2009 Andrea James. All rights reserved.
 

Legal Info / Terms of Use Revised 30 December, 2001 .