hair removal
hair removal facts for consumers
  
  Home  Medical data  Laser/Light  Diode  Eremia 2001   
   
NAVIGATION




> Home
> Methods
> Directory
> Search

> "Permanent" *
> Electrolysis *
> Home electro *
> Laser *
> Flashlamp/IPL *
> Combinations *
space * see> note

> Hair inhibitors
> Rx oral meds
> Vaniqa

> Temporary
> Shaving
> Depilatories
> Friction
> Tweezing
> Waxing
> Sugaring
> Threading
> Rotary epilators

> Doubtful
> Electric tweezer
> Transdermal
> Transcutaneous
> Photoepilators
> Microwaves
> Dietary products
> Herbal inhibitors

> Recommended
> Epilators
> Electric razors
> Home electrolysis
> Hot wax kits
> Tweezers
> Aftercare
> Books

> Other topics
>  How to choose
>  Tips
>  Clinical data
>  Manufacturers
>  Regulation
>  Info sources
>  Scams
>  Ripped off?

>  FAQ
>  Glossary
>  Site info
>  Feedback

Eremia, 2001

Title: Laser Hair Removal with Alexandrite versus Diode Laser Using Four Treatment Sessions: 1-Year Results.

Authors: Eremia S, Li C, Newman N.

Journal: Dermatol Surg 2001 Nov;27(11):925-930

PMID: 11737125 ABSTRACT

Affiliated institution: Division of Dermatology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, Brockton Cosmetic Surgery Center, Riverside, California, and Beverly Hills, California.

BACKGROUND: Laser hair removal is the treatment of choice for hypertrichosis. The two most commonly used hair removal lasers are compared.

OBJECTIVE: To present the results of a comparative study examining the role of wavelength, fluence, spot size, pulse width, and cooling systems on long-term results after a series of four laser hair removal treatments using the 755 nm alexandrite and 800-810 nm diode lasers.

METHODS: The axillae of 15 untanned, type I-V patients were treated side by side four times at 4- to 6-week intervals with a 755 nm, 3-msec pulse width, cryogen spray-equipped alexandrite laser and an 800 nm, variable pulse width, cooled sapphire window-equipped diode laser. Each patient was pretested and treated with the maximum fluence tolerated at the largest spot size available for each laser (12 mm round/113 mm2 for the alexandrite and 9 mm for the diode).

RESULTS: Evaluations were done at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the last treatment. Twelve-month results with the alexandrite and diode lasers achieved 85% versus 84% hair reduction. The fact that tan avoidance was strictly followed permitted the use of relatively high fluences (25-30+ J/cm2) even in type IV patients. For most patients, four treatment sessions using high fluences (30-40 J/cm2) with relatively large spot sizes (12 mm round for the 755 nm alexandrite and 9 mm for the 800 nm diode) resulted in 12-month hair reductions in the 90% range.

CONCLUSION: Both the alexandrite and diode lasers in this 12-month study produced excellent long-term hair reductions.

 

Was this helpful?  Support this site!
Still have questions? Ask them at my free HairTell  hair removal forum!

   
         

 

© 1996-2008 Andrea James. All rights reserved.
 

Legal Info / Terms of Use Revised 31 December, 2001 .