hair removal
hair removal facts: click for consumer recommendations
  
  Home  Medical data  Topicals  O'Grady 1989   
   
NAVIGATION




Hair Removal Home
Hair Removal Methods
Hair Removal Directory
Hair Removal Search

Hair Removal "Permanent" *
Hair Removal Electrolysis *
Hair Removal Home electro *
Hair Removal Laser *
Hair Removal Flashlamp/IPL *
Hair Removal Combinations *
space * seeHair Removal note

Hair Removal Hair inhibitors
Hair Removal Home laser
Hair Removal Rx oral meds
Hair Removal Vaniqa

Hair Removal Temporary
Hair Removal Shaving
Hair Removal Depilatories
Hair Removal Friction
Hair Removal Tweezing
Hair Removal Waxing
Hair Removal Sugaring
Hair Removal Threading
Hair Removal Rotary epilators

Hair Removal Doubtful
Hair Removal Electric tweezer
Hair Removal Transdermal
Hair Removal Transcutaneous
Hair Removal Photoepilators
Hair Removal Microwaves
Hair Removal Dietary products
Hair Removal Herbal inhibitors

Hair Removal Recommended
Hair Removal Epilators
Hair Removal Electric razors
Hair Removal Home electrolysis
Hair Removal Home laser/IPL
Hair Removal Hot wax kits
Hair Removal Tweezers
Hair Removal Aftercare
Hair Removal Books

Hair Removal Other topics
Hair Removal  How to choose
Hair Removal  Tips
Hair Removal  Clinical data
Hair Removal  Manufacturers
Hair Removal  Regulation
Hair Removal  Info sources
Hair Removal  Scams
Hair Removal  Ripped off?

Hair Removal  FAQ
Hair Removal  Glossary
Hair Removal  Site info
Hair Removal  Feedback

O'Grady, 1989

Title: Mass eye casualties at sea.

Author: O'Grady TC

Journal:Mil Med 1989 Dec;154(12):596-8

PMID: 2513527

Affiliated institution:

Cited in:

During a "crossing the line ceremony" conducted aboard ship while returning from an extended deployment, 40 active duty sailors inadvertently received eye injuries from a chemical agent. The agent was suspected to be Magic Shave, a chemical depilatory powder containing calcium hydroxide as the active ingredient. Therefore, the resulting corneal burns were alkali in nature. Twenty of the 40 patients required admission to sick bay for 1 to 2 days. The remaining patients were followed on an outpatient basis. All patients were treated with irrigation of the affected eyes and most required patching for at least several days. No permanent eye disabilities resulted. The emergency treatment of chemical eye injuries is reviewed.

 

Was this helpful?  Support this site!
Still have questions? Ask them at my free HairTell  hair removal forum!

   
         

 

© 1996-2009 Andrea James. All rights reserved.
 

Legal Info / Terms of Use Revised 30 December, 2001 .