hair removal hair removal facts for consumers
Support this site!
  
  Home  Medical data  Laser/Light  Alexandrite  Finkel 1997   
   
N A V I G A T I O N


 Home
 Methods
 Directory
 Search

"Permanent" *
Electrolysis *
Home electro *
Laser *
Flashlamp/IPL *
Combinations *
* see note

Hair inhibitors
Rx oral meds
Vaniqa

Temporary
Shaving
Depilatories
Friction
Tweezing
Waxing
Sugaring
Threading
Rotary epilators

Doubtful
Electric tweezer
Transdermal
Transcutaneous
Photoepilators
Microwaves
Dietary products
Herbal inhibitors

Other topics
 How to choose
 Tips
 Clinical data
 Manufacturers
 Regulation
 Info sources
 Scams
 Ripped off?

 FAQ
 Glossary
 Site info
 Feedback

Finkel, 1997

Title: Pulsed alexandrite laser technology for noninvasive hair removal.

Authors: Finkel B, Eliezri YD, Waldman A, Slatkine M

Journal: J Clin Laser Med Surg 1997;15(5):225-9

PMID: 9612175, UI: 98275122

Affiliated institution: Elisha Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.

Cited in:

OBJECTIVE: Determination of the efficacy of pulsed Alexandrite Laser technology for rapid noninvasive hair removal.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although previous studies have already shown that Ruby lasers are capable of noninvasive hair removal, a technology for the substantial increase of treatment speed is of great interest.

METHODS: We have used a 2 msec free running pulsed Alexandrite (lambda = 755 nm) laser operated at a repetition rate of up to 5 pps at energy fluences of 25-40 J/cm2 to treat a wide range of body sites on 126 patients in conjunction with a fiber delivery system and a transparent target ruler. A transparent gel was used as epidermal heat sink. The study lasted 15 months. Pretreatment as well as follow-up hair count per cm2 was performed to determine the level of success. Treatments were repeated when 1-2 mm growth was observed.

RESULTS: The average hair count before the second treatment was found to be close to 65% of the pretreatment count. The average hair count 3 months after the last treatment, was found to be lower than 12%. The interval between treatments ranged from 4 weeks to 3 1/2 months.

CONCLUSIONS: The 2 msec pulsed Alexandrite laser technology is effective for the removal of unwanted hairs, ranging from fair to dark, except when hairs are absent in the shaft depending on the stage of their growth cycle. This results in the necessity of a few treatments or touchups. Adverse effects are minimal and transient.

 

Was this helpful?  Support this site!
Still have questions? Ask them at my free HairTell  hair removal forum!

   
         

 

© 1996-2008 Andrea James. All rights reserved.
 

Legal Info / Terms of Use Revised 30 December, 2001 .