GHR and AHRS "studies": who stole from whom? Stolen almost word-for-word
GHR electric tweezer maker Judith Stephens has a long resume
of  fake credentials. But
were GHR "clinical studies" stolen by rival AHRS?
Compare for yourself
Look at these "studies" on a GHR promotional site called
"Kitty's Consumer Beware":
http://www.consumerbeware.com/ghr_studies.htm
Now compare them to the "original" data from AHRS's
1990 FDA 510(k) submission:
AHRS effectiveness study
AHRS pH analysis
Here's a text version showing the just how much of the AHRS "studies"
are identical to GHR data :
Effectiveness data
pH data
Obviously Stephens is happily passing off AHRS data as GHR's
, or vice versa, thanks to the help of several accomplices, including
a web designer who has gone to great lengths to make the GHR scam
seem legitimate.
"Kitty's Consumer
Beware" is a GHR sales site run by one of Judith Stephens'
collaborators. The site designer, a former GHR salesperson using
the alias "Katherine 'Kitty' Cook," has collected a
rag-tag group of accomplices, some already known in the world
of hair removal scams. These people have conspired to develop
a sales site masquerading as a consumer advocacy site. They have
attempted to lay a veneer of truth over the deceptive and illegal
sales tactics of Stephens and her accomplices.
By comparing "Kitty's" page (or another GHR sales site) with the AHRS submission data,
it's clear that either AHRS or GHR has simply replaced the name
of the rival device with their device.
Shame on everyone involved in promoting GHR and AHRS through
Kitty's Consumer Beware and other promotional sites. One of these
manufacturers is obviously lying. If any of these people had ethics,
they would distance themselves from participating in this sort
of illegal activity. I call on all of them to denounce this plagiarism
and stop associating with scam artists before they find themselves
in legal trouble.
|
hair removal
facts
for consumers
