hair removal
hair removal facts for consumers
  
  Home  Electric tweezers GHR FDA violation (scan)   
   
NAVIGATION




> Home
> Methods
> Directory
> Search

> "Permanent" *
> Electrolysis *
> Home electro *
> Laser *
> Flashlamp/IPL *
> Combinations *
space * see> note

> Hair inhibitors
> Rx oral meds
> Vaniqa

> Temporary
> Shaving
> Depilatories
> Friction
> Tweezing
> Waxing
> Sugaring
> Threading
> Rotary epilators

> Doubtful
> Electric tweezer
> Transdermal
> Transcutaneous
> Photoepilators
> Microwaves
> Dietary products
> Herbal inhibitors

> Recommended
> Epilators
> Electric razors
> Home electrolysis
> Hot wax kits
> Tweezers
> Aftercare
> Books

> Other topics
>  How to choose
>  Tips
>  Clinical data
>  Manufacturers
>  Regulation
>  Info sources
>  Scams
>  Ripped off?

>  FAQ
>  Glossary
>  Site info
>  Feedback

GHR cited by FDA for violations

Scan of letter from FDA

The Certified letter below was sent to Judith Stephens on January 15, 1997. Stephens still makes illegal claims of painlessness and refers frequently to FDA in promotional material. When asked about her non-response to this letter in 1998, Stephens claimed she never got this certified letter.

Below is a scan of the letter. Click here to view the complete text of FDA's letter.

 

 

Was this helpful?  Support this site!
Still have questions? Ask them at my free HairTell  hair removal forum!

   
         

 

© 1996-2008 Andrea James. All rights reserved.
 

Legal Info / Terms of Use Revised 30 December, 2001 .