Best permanent hair removal methods

Permanent hair removal: effectiveness

No permanent hair removal method is 100% effective in all clients

If you’re seeking > permanent hair removal, several > permanent hair removal methods have been developed. All methods have some clients who do not seem to respond to treatment. The reason is unknown, and the exact percentages are not established. Below are some examples of human clinical studies published in medical journals or submitted to FDA. Note that some studies report good results but do not report non-responders. Laser clinical results are still widely variable in the published literature, with long-term response rates from 0% to 100%, depending on the study.

Method Study # in study # (%) with significant change**
OTC* hair inhibitors NONE
“Transdermal NONE
“Transcutaneous NONE
Photoepilators NONE
Microwave NONE
Electric tweezers Verdich (1984) 8 0 (0%)
Vaniqa FDA data (2000) *** 393 228 (58%)
Electrolysis Verdich (1979) 56 50 (90%)
Electrolysis Richards (1986) 281 261 (93%)
Flashlamp Sadick (1999) 67 28 (41%)
Laser (alexandrite) Eremia (2001) 89 89? (?)
Laser (diode) Alster (2001) 20 20? (?)
Laser (diode) Baumler (2002) 16 4 (25%)
Laser (ruby) Liew (1999) 48 17 (35%)
Laser (Nd:YAG) Nanni (1997) 12 0 (0%)

*** OTC = over the counter topical products sold on the web and on infomercials
*** defined in this table as significant change in amount of hair at more than 6 months after last treatment
*** unpublishedFor more on this, see my section on clinical data.

For more on this, see my section on clinical data.

See also hair removal definitions for more about vague terms used by this industry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>