hair removal
hair removal facts: click for consumer recommendations
  
  Home  Photolysis HR   
   
NAVIGATION




Hair Removal Home
Hair Removal Methods
Hair Removal Directory
Hair Removal Search

Hair Removal "Permanent" *
Hair Removal Electrolysis *
Hair Removal Home electro *
Hair Removal Laser *
Hair Removal Flashlamp/IPL *
Hair Removal Combinations *
space * seeHair Removal note

Hair Removal Hair inhibitors
Hair Removal Home laser
Hair Removal Rx oral meds
Hair Removal Vaniqa

Hair Removal Temporary
Hair Removal Shaving
Hair Removal Depilatories
Hair Removal Friction
Hair Removal Tweezing
Hair Removal Waxing
Hair Removal Sugaring
Hair Removal Threading
Hair Removal Rotary epilators

Hair Removal Doubtful
Hair Removal Electric tweezer
Hair Removal Transdermal
Hair Removal Transcutaneous
Hair Removal Photoepilators
Hair Removal Microwaves
Hair Removal Dietary products
Hair Removal Herbal inhibitors

Hair Removal Recommended
Hair Removal Epilators
Hair Removal Electric razors
Hair Removal Home electrolysis
Hair Removal Home laser/IPL
Hair Removal Hot wax kits
Hair Removal Tweezers
Hair Removal Aftercare
Hair Removal Books

Hair Removal Other topics
Hair Removal  How to choose
Hair Removal  Tips
Hair Removal  Clinical data
Hair Removal  Manufacturers
Hair Removal  Regulation
Hair Removal  Info sources
Hair Removal  Scams
Hair Removal  Ripped off?

Hair Removal  FAQ
Hair Removal  Glossary
Hair Removal  Site info
Hair Removal  Feedback

Photolysis HR

Basic facts:

Photolysis HR is basically just a marketing term for a flash lamp procedure using multiple pulses. The treatments, sold at the California-based Institute of Laser Medicine (ILM) are certainly overhyped by the physician/salesman offering the treatments. Is it better than other flash lamps like EpiLight, or is it better than lasers as he claims? Let's cut through the considerable amount of hype and take a look at the facts.

Update: On 6 December 2001, a lawyer for Photolysis HR sent me a letter threatening legal action. If I ever receive a reply to the questions in my response, I will make it available.

Corporate offices

Address: Institute of Laser Medicine 100 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suites 205-210, Los Angeles, California 90095
Phone: (310) 824-6191
website: www.lasermedicine.org
website: www.universitylaser.com (mirror site)
website: www.consumerlaserguide.com ("educational" site)

Address: 361 Hospital Road, Suite 428, Newport Beach, California 92663
Phone: (949) 574-8400

Institute Research Associates, A Medical Group, Inc..

Personnel

Edward Lewis Tobinick, M.D.
Susan Davoodifar, M.D. (no longer associated) *

* I received the following note on 19 January 2006: "I am writing to request the removal of my wife’s name (Susan Davoodifar, MD) [from your site]. We believe that your website wrongfully involves her in your accusations as she was working at the ILM solely as an employee. She never had at any point any involvement in the business operations of the ILM other than treating patients, which she did with great professionalism, care and highest levels of ethics. At no time was she involved in any business decision or managerial activities, as well as advertising and marketing of the ILM. In addition, it is outdated information as she has not been working at the Institute of Laser Medicine for a considerable amount of time."

Marketing terms:

Photolysis HRŸ

Synthesized Light TechnologyŸ

Tuned Multipulse(TMP)Ÿ Technology

Site analysis

Every hair removal method has a couple of overexuberant salespeople. For flash lamps, it's Dr. Edward Tobinick.

The hype:

"available exclusively at the Institute of Laser Medicine."

"There is not a comparable facility anywhere else in the world."

"unparalleled clinical advantages"

"finest facility"

"unparalleled quality"

"the skin itself is unaffected."

"overwhelming first choice"

"Ability to treat hair of all colors" (note: After being discussed on hairfacts, Photolysis HR removed this fraudulent claim in November 2001)

Perhaps the most unfounded claim was the comparison chart which claimed Photolysis HR is a "third generation" device with better safety and efficacy that ruby and alexandrite lasers. There is no published data supporting this claim. (note: After being discussed on hairfacts, Photolysis HR removed this fraudulent claim in November 2001 and replaced it with other promotional material.)

Also misleading are poorly labeled results photos with no long term follow-up after final treatment. Most were taken in 1997, and the accompanying captions often suggest a complete and permanent result after one treatment:

One caption of a patient's test patch states the patient "had his entire beard removed with the same process. This took only one hour." This caption suggests permanent and complete male facial hair removal in just one treatment, which is not typical and was probably not the case with the pictured patient.

Another caption of a patient's chest states the procedure is "gentle, instantaneous, and had no side effects of any kind, other than complete loss of hair." Well, no side effects except for the outbreak of acne and ingrown hairs shown four weeks after treatment.

The reality (as stated elsewhere in Photolysis HR promotional material):

"Individual results for any given patient cannot be guaranteed, nor can they be predicted with absolute accuracy. Results may vary. Although permanent hair reduction can occur after laser hair removal, for any given patient no assurance of permanency can be guaranteed, nor is any implied."

"The best candidates have dark, coarse hair and light skin. Blond and red hair on tanned skin cannot be successfully treated."

"Brown and black hair is the easiest to remove. White and gray hair, which lack pigment, will not respond to treatment. Blond and red hair is difficult to remove with current laser technology."

"At the present time all of the laser technologies have difficulty treating patients with dark skin. This includes dark African-American patients and darkly skinned members of other darkly pigmented races(such as dark Middle Eastern and dark Indian patients). Lighter skinned people of color can generally be treated as long as their hair is dark and coarse."

The facts about multiple pulses

Dr. Tobinick's patents discuss "parametrically defined pulse groups," which he claims can allow "the use of greater energy with greater safety, when compared with single pulse laser delivery." Studies do indicate that multiple pulse treatments are "clinically superior to single pulse laser delivery," as he says, but multiple pulses are certainly not exclusive to Photolysis. Almost all lasers and flash lamps allow for multiple pulses.

Patents

6,168,589 "Apparatus and method employing a single laser for removal of hair"
6,165,171 "Apparatus and method employing lasers for removal of hair"
6,149,645 "Apparatus and method employing lasers for removal of hair"
6,080,147 "Method of employing a flashlamp for removal of hair, veins and capillaries"

Trademarks

Photolysis is a term used outside of hair removal, but is trademarked for use in hair removal as"Photolysis HR" by ILM:

Typed Drawing
Word Mark PHOTOLYSIS HR
Goods and Services IC 042. US 100 101. G & S: cosmetic services in the nature of removal of unwanted hair.
FIRST USE: 19970901.
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19970901
Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING
Serial Number 75268412
Filing Date April 2, 1997
Filed ITU FILED AS ITU
Published for Opposition February 24, 1998
Registration Number 2232801
Registration Date March 16, 1999
Owner (REGISTRANT) Tobinick, Edward L. INDIVIDUAL UNITED STATES 100 UCLA
Medical Plaza, Suite 205 Los Angeles CALIFORNIA 900956903
Attorney of Record DOUGLAS LIPSTONE
Disclaimer NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "PHOTOLYSIS" APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN
Type of Mark SERVICE MARK
Register PRINCIPAL
Live/Dead Indicator LIVE

 

Was this helpful?  Support this site!
Still have questions? Ask them at my free HairTell  hair removal forum!

   
         

 

© 1996-2009 Andrea James. All rights reserved.
 

Legal Info / Terms of Use Revised 30 January, 2006 .